Server exposes 15 file management tools with Zod-validated schemas, but suffers from critical gaps in naming clarity, parameter descriptions, and output documentation. Tool names use Chinese descriptions and inconsistent verb prefixes (fs* prefix is non-standard). Many parameters lack descriptions or have minimal ones. No output schemas documented. Error handling is absent, tools return raw JSON without guidance. Descriptions are present but generic (10-30 chars), below the 50-200 char LLM-optimized baseline. This is a typical community server with functional but poorly-documented tools.

• Rename tools to follow verb_noun pattern: 'fsList' → 'list_files', 'fsGet' → 'get_file_info', 'fsRemove' → 'delete_file'. This makes intent immediately clear to LLMs.
• Expand all descriptions to 50-200 characters in English. Example: 'fsList' → 'List files and directories in a given path. Returns metadata including size, type, and modification time. Use pagination (page, per_page) for large directories.'
• Document output schemas for each tool. Specify response fields, types, and pagination structure. E.g., 'Returns {items: [{name, type, size, modified_at}], total: number, has_more: boolean}'.
• Add enum constraints for 'scope' in fsSearch (0='all', 1='folders', 2='files') and 'tool' in fsAdd_offline_download ('aria2'|'SimpleHttp'|'qBittorrent'). Replace free-form strings with validated enums.
• Implement confirmation pattern for destructive tools: add a 'confirm' parameter or split into 'preview_delete' + 'confirm_delete' to prevent accidental data loss.