Server has 47 tools with consistent naming (verb_noun pattern) and basic schemas. All tools have descriptions (10-100 chars, mostly 40-80 chars). Input schemas present for all tools with type definitions. However, descriptions are often too brief (e.g., 'List all domains in your portfolio' lacks context on when to use vs alternatives). Parameter descriptions are minimal, many lack format/constraint guidance. Output schemas are not documented. Error handling is generic (formatResult wrapper). No pagination guidance despite tools returning lists. Missing idempotent/destructive hints in most tool definitions despite risk annotations in metadata.

• Document output schemas for all tools. Add a 'Returns' section to each tool description or register outputSchema in tool definition. Example: 'Returns {domain: string, available: boolean, price: number, currency: string}'.
• Expand descriptions to 100-150 chars. Include WHEN to use (e.g., 'Call this before domains_purchase to verify availability'), WHAT it returns, and any prerequisites. Reference pattern:tool-description baseline of 194 chars avg.
• Add pagination to list tools: accept limit (1-100, default 20) and offset/cursor parameters. Document result limits in descriptions. Return total_count or next_cursor in responses.
• Implement confirmation pattern for destructive tools. Add optional 'confirm' boolean parameter or return 'input_required' result asking user to confirm before executing delete/unlink operations.
• Enhance parameter descriptions with format/constraint guidance. Use enums for fixed sets (redirect_type: ['301', '302']), regex patterns for formats (domain: /^[a-z0-9.-]+\.[a-z]{2,}$/), and ranges for numbers (limit: 1-100).

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Dynamic Client Registration (deprecated) - use Client ID Metadata Documents (CIMD)