An MCP server configuration for the AntiGravity Launchpad project, integrating with Serena for memory management and code analysis capabilities
Critical failures across all dimensions. Tool definitions exist only in .agent/mcp.json as a static configuration file with minimal metadata. No actual MCP server implementation is visible in the source code. Tool names lack action verbs (e.g., 'think_about_*' instead of 'analyze_*' or 'evaluate_*'). Descriptions are extremely brief (5-30 chars), far below the 10-1024 char baseline. No input schemas, parameter types, or output schemas are documented anywhere. No error handling, validation, or recovery guidance. The server appears to be a configuration wrapper around an external 'serena' provider rather than a functional MCP implementation.
Activate a project
Check if onboarding has been performed
Delete memory entries
Edit existing memory entries
Find a file in the project
Find symbols that reference a given symbol
Find a specific symbol in the codebase
Get the current project configuration
No input schemas visible for any tool. All 22 tools lack parameter definitions, types, and constraints.
Descriptions are critically short (5-30 chars, well below 10-1024 baseline). Examples: 'Read memory entries' (20 chars), 'Write memory entries' (20 chars). No parameter descriptions exist.
Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 21 | <=2025-11-25 | v2 |
Get an overview of symbols in the codebase
Insert code after a symbol
Insert code before a symbol
List directory contents
List all memory entries
Perform onboarding
Read memory entries
Rename a symbol
Replace the body of a symbol
Search for a pattern in the codebase
Think about collected information
Think about task adherence
Think about whether you are done
Write memory entries
Tool names 'think_about_*' lack action verbs and are vague. 'think_about_collected_information' does not convey what the tool does or when to call it. Should be 'analyze_*', 'evaluate_*', or 'summarize_*' with clear intent.
No output schemas documented. LLMs cannot infer what fields to expect from tool responses, breaking downstream tool chaining and forcing discovery detours.
No error handling or recovery guidance. Destructive tools (delete_memory, replace_symbol_body) lack confirmation patterns or dry-run support. No validation rules or actionable error messages.