34 tools with minimal schema visibility and sparse parameter documentation. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (godot_orient, godot_create_script) but descriptions are terse (10-50 chars, well below the 194-char baseline). No input schemas visible in provided source. Parameter types and constraints absent. Output schemas undocumented. Error handling guidance missing. Composition is reasonable (single responsibility per tool), but definition quality falls significantly short of production standards.

• Add explicit JSON Schema input definitions for all 34 tools. Include type, description, and constraints for every parameter. Example: { 'type': 'object', 'properties': { 'scene_path': { 'type': 'string', 'description': 'Relative path to .tscn file, e.g. res://scenes/main.tscn' } }, 'required': ['scene_path'] }
• Expand tool descriptions to 100-200 chars. Answer: What does it do? When to call it instead of similar tools? What does it return? Example: 'Get the scene tree structure of the currently open scene. Returns node hierarchy with node_id, name, type, and children. Call this after godot_get_open_scenes to inspect a specific scene.'
• Document output schemas for all tools. Specify return type (object/array), field names, types, and what IDs/references are included for chaining. Example: godot_get_open_scenes returns { scenes: [{ scene_id: string, path: string, name: string }], total: number }
• Add parameter descriptions to all tools. For each parameter, state its type, valid values/ranges, and format. Example: 'node_id (string): Unique identifier of the node to modify. Obtain from godot_get_scene_tree.'
• Implement confirmation or dry-run for destructive tools (delete_node, batch with writes). Return a confirmation_required response with a summary of changes, then require a confirm_delete or confirm_batch call to proceed.