Single tool 'create_image' has a well-structured schema generated from Zod with proper typing and enums for size/quality/background/model. Description is comprehensive (280+ chars) and explains use cases, parameters, and references documentation. However, parameter descriptions in the schema are minimal (1-2 sentences each), lacking actionable guidance on format, constraints, and dependencies. No output schema is documented, LLMs cannot predict what fields the response contains. Error handling is present but not visible in tool definition. Tool follows verb_noun naming correctly. Overall solid foundation but missing output documentation and richer parameter guidance.

• Document the complete output schema in the tool description or as a separate schema field. Example: 'Returns {image_url: string, file_path: string, dimensions: {width: number, height: number}, model_used: string, created_at: ISO8601}'.
• Expand parameter descriptions to 50-100 chars each. For 'styleDefinitionJSON', add: 'JSON object with keys like tone (string), color_palette (array of hex codes), lighting (string), composition (string). Example: {tone: "moody", color_palette: ["#1a1a1a", "#ff6b6b"]}'.
• Add error recovery guidance to tool description: 'On rate limit (429), retry after 60 seconds. On invalid prompt, simplify description and remove special characters. On file write error, check targetProjectDir permissions.'
• Migrate from STDIO to HTTP+SSE or Streamable HTTP transport to enable remote client access and hosted deployments.
• Add tool annotations: mark create_image as destructive (writes files, incurs API costs) and non-idempotent (repeated calls with same prompt may produce different images).

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry