52 tools with consistent naming (verb_noun pattern: get_, list_, system-*) and descriptions present. However, 45 tools lack visible input schemas in the provided source excerpt, only ros-command and device-list show explicit schema definitions. Descriptions are adequate (100 - 200 chars typical) but many are generic ('Get X on one or all devices') without explaining WHEN to use them or what downstream tools need. No output schemas documented. Error handling and recovery guidance absent. Tool composition is sound (single responsibility), but parameter descriptions are minimal.

• Add explicit input schemas (JSON Schema with type, description, enum/pattern constraints) to all 45 tools currently lacking them. Minimum: target parameter (string, 'Device ID, comma-separated IDs, or all') for read-only tools.
• Write LLM-optimized descriptions (50 - 200 chars) for all tools. Include WHEN to use (e.g., 'Call this first to discover available devices'), WHAT it returns (e.g., 'Returns list of device IDs and names'), and any prerequisites.
• Document output schemas for all tools. Specify returned fields, types, and which IDs/references enable chaining to downstream tools (e.g., device_id for ros-command).
• Add dry-run or confirmation step to ros-command. Return a preview of the command and require explicit confirmation before execution on production devices.
• Add error recovery guidance to all tools. E.g., 'Device not found. Call device-list to see available targets.' Categorize errors as retryable, user-fixable, or fatal.

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Stateful initialize / Mcp-Session-Id (removed; protocol is stateless) - make each request self-contained