The server defines 7 tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but falls short of production quality. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (deck_ask, deck_notify, etc.), which is good. However, descriptions are minimal (10-50 chars), parameter descriptions are sparse or missing, and output schemas are undocumented. The 'action' parameter in deck_set_key is typed as 'object' with no nested schema. deck_propose_page has nested objects (discord, obs) with minimal field documentation. Error handling exists but lacks recovery guidance. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint/destructiveHint) despite clear WRITE vs READ_ONLY risk classifications in the metadata.

• Add explicit output schemas to deck_status and deck_integrations. Document the structure of the returned JSON (e.g., 'Returns {connected: boolean, current_page: string, keys: [{index: number, label: string, ...}]}'). This enables agents to extract and chain data.
• Expand deck_set_key's 'action' parameter schema. Define it as an object with discriminated union: {type: 'hotkey'|'discord'|'obs'|'text'|'program', ...properties}. Document each action type and its required fields.
• Add tool annotations to the schema. Mark deck_set_key, deck_propose_page, and deck_reset_page with 'destructiveHint: true' or 'idempotentHint: true' to signal safety properties to agents.
• Enhance parameter descriptions with constraints and examples. E.g., 'timeout_seconds (5-3600, default 300): How long to wait for user input. If timeout expires, returns {selected: null, timed_out: true}.'
• Implement structured error responses. Return {error: string, category: 'retryable'|'user_fixable'|'fatal', suggestion: string} so agents know whether to retry, ask the user, or abort.