Critical gaps across all dimensions. Tool definitions are inferred from file structure and brief descriptions only, no visible input schemas, parameter types, or output documentation in provided source. Descriptions are minimal (10-50 chars), well below the 194-char baseline for production tools. No evidence of parameter validation, error handling guidance, or composition patterns. STDIO transport and lack of schema visibility cap confidence further.

• Add complete JSON Schema definitions for all tool inputs. Include type, description, enum constraints, and min/max for every parameter. Example: 'group_id' should be {type: 'string', description: 'The unique identifier of the group (UUID format)', pattern: '^[a-f0-9-]{36}$'}.
• Expand all tool descriptions to 100-200 characters. Include WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it, and key prerequisites. Example: 'Create a new identity in the network. Call this first to establish your agent's presence. Returns identity_id needed for all subsequent operations.'
• Document output schemas for all tools. Specify which fields are returned, their types, and which are required for chaining. Example: create_identity should return {identity_id, display_name, created_at, public_key}.
• Add pagination to list_* and discover_* tools. Include limit (default 20, max 100), offset/cursor, and total_count in responses. Example: list_groups(limit=20, offset=0) returns {groups: [...], total: 42, has_more: true}.
• Add error handling guidance to descriptions of write tools (create_*, update_*, send_*, set_*). State whether operations are idempotent and what errors are retryable. Example: 'send_message is idempotent, retrying with the same message_id returns the same result without duplicating.'

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Dynamic Client Registration (deprecated) - use Client ID Metadata Documents (CIMD)