Significant gaps across naming, descriptions, and schemas. Tool names lack clear action verbs (swap-token, transfer-token use hyphens inconsistently). Descriptions are minimal (10-50 chars, well below 194-char baseline). Critical parameters lack descriptions: swap-token omits output_amount description; bridge-token has typo 'ouput_token_address' and vague descriptions. Schemas present but incomplete, many parameters undescribed. No output schemas documented. Error handling absent. Security concerns: no indication of secret injection for wallet operations. Composition issues: staking-token lacks action clarity (stake vs unstake toggle missing). Overall, definitions would not pass production code review.

• Add 50-150 character descriptions to every tool explaining WHAT it does, WHEN to use it, and any prerequisites. Current descriptions (10-50 chars) are below the 194-char baseline.
• Document output schemas for all tools. Specify field names, types, and which fields are required for downstream tool chaining (e.g., swap-token should return transaction_id, output_amount, status).
• Add descriptions to every parameter. For enum parameters (network: [bnb, solana, ethereum]), explain what each value means. For amount fields, specify units (wei, tokens, decimals).
• Split staking-token into stake_token and unstake_token. Each tool should have one clear action. Add a 'action' enum parameter if consolidation is required, but prefer separate tools.
• Fix schema typo (ouput_token_address → output_token_address) and add validation constraints. Specify that amounts are strings representing token amounts, not wei or raw units.