This server exposes 7 tools for orchestrating Claude Code sessions. Tool naming follows verb_noun convention (claude_interactive_*), which is good. However, descriptions are minimal (10-30 chars), parameter descriptions are sparse or missing, and input schemas lack proper type definitions and constraints. No output schemas are documented. Error handling is absent, tools return raw errors with no recovery guidance. The server is STDIO-only, which caps protocol readiness at 50. Overall, this is a D-grade server with significant gaps in LLM-friendliness.

• Expand tool descriptions to 100-200 chars. Include WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it (vs similar tools), and what it returns. E.g., 'Start a new interactive Claude Code session with a specified role (explorer, reviewer, etc.). Use this to begin a new conversation; call claude_interactive_request to send prompts. Returns session_id for subsequent calls.'
• Add enum constraints to 'role' (explorer|reviewer|security_reviewer|critic|architect|implementer), 'effort' (low|medium|high), and 'mcp_preset' (none|auto|serena|context7|serena_context7). Document these in parameter descriptions.
• Document output schemas for all tools. E.g., claude_interactive_start returns {session_id: string, created_at: string}; claude_interactive_list returns {sessions: [{id: string, role: string, created_at: string}], total: number}.
• Add error handling with recovery guidance. E.g., 'Session not found. Call claude_interactive_list to see active sessions.' or 'Timeout waiting for response. Increase timeout_ms or call claude_interactive_tail to check output.'
• Add parameter descriptions explaining context and constraints. E.g., 'idle_ms: milliseconds to wait for no new output before returning (0 = return immediately if data available). timeout_ms: total time to wait before giving up (must be >= idle_ms).'