Forkable-mcp has well-structured tool definitions with consistent naming (verb_noun pattern), comprehensive parameter schemas using Zod, and clear descriptions. All 11 tools follow the verb-first convention (confirm_, get_, list_, rate_, remove_, search_, set_). Descriptions are present and actionable (avg ~120 chars). However, several tools lack output schema documentation, error handling guidance is minimal, and some parameter descriptions could be more explicit about constraints and formats. The write-gate pattern (preview + confirmToken) is well-designed for safety but underdocumented in tool descriptions.

• Document output schemas for all tools. For write tools (confirm_delivery, rate_meal, etc.), specify the structure of the preview object and confirmToken. For read tools, list all returned fields with types.
• Add error handling guidance to tool descriptions. E.g., 'May fail if delivery is locked or user lacks permission. If you get a permission error, ask the user to check their role.'
• Convert parameter constraints to enums where applicable. rate_meal's 'level' should be enum [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. compliments and issues should list valid codes as enums.
• Expand confirmation pattern documentation. Explain that write tools return a preview first; the LLM must review and call again with confirmToken to commit. Clarify what the preview contains.
• Add pagination to list_deliveries. Accept limit (default 20, max 100) and offset parameters; return total_count and has_more flags so the LLM can iterate through large delivery lists.