Four tools with basic descriptions and minimal schemas. All tools have descriptions (10-200 chars range) and input parameters with type definitions, but lack depth in parameter descriptions and output schema documentation. No error handling guidance, no parameter constraints (enums, ranges), and no documentation of return structures. Naming is clear and verb-based (save_, update_, get_, search_). Tool composition is reasonable but lacks idempotency guarantees and chaining metadata.

• Expand update_memory description to 100+ chars explaining: what 'key' parameter is (memory ID returned by save_memory?), when to use vs save_memory, and what happens if key not found.
• Document output schemas for all tools. E.g., save_memory returns {success: bool, memory_id: string, timestamp: ISO8601}; get_all_memories returns {memories: [{id, content, created_at}], total_count, page}.
• Add parameter constraints: search_memories limit 1-100 (default 3), text/query max 10000 chars, key must be non-empty string.
• Add error handling guidance: 'If memory not found, try search_memories() first. If update fails due to concurrent modification, retry with fresh key from get_all_memories().'
• Document idempotency: 'save_memory is idempotent, calling twice with same text may create one or two records depending on Mem0 deduplication. update_memory is idempotent if key is stable.'

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry