This is a demo/shim server with minimal production intent. All 6 tools have basic descriptions (10-50 chars) and simple input schemas with only 1-2 parameters each. Schemas are present but lack depth: no enums, no format constraints, no output schema documentation. Descriptions are too brief to guide LLM selection (e.g., 'Read the contents of a file from the workspace' is generic). No error handling guidance, no parameter validation rules, no security warnings despite destructive/irreversible operations. Tools are well-named (verb_noun pattern) but lack the richness expected of production tools. The shim is intentionally lightweight for demo purposes, not a reference implementation.

• Expand each tool description to 100-200 chars. Include WHAT it does, WHEN to use it, and what it returns. E.g., 'Read a file from the workspace. Use this to inspect configuration, logs, or data files. Returns the full file contents as a string. Fails if the file does not exist.'
• Document output schemas for all tools. E.g., read_file returns {type: 'string', description: 'File contents'}; write_file returns {type: 'object', properties: {bytes_written: {type: 'integer'}, path: {type: 'string'}}}.
• Add parameter constraints: 'path' should validate against path traversal (no '..'); 'url' should validate as a valid HTTP(S) URL; 'command' should document shell syntax expectations.
• Add error handling guidance: 'If file not found, check the path and try list_files. If permission denied, verify workspace access.'
• For destructive operations (delete_file, run_shell), add a 'confirm' boolean parameter or document a confirmation workflow to prevent accidental data loss.