Server has 4 tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps in parameter documentation and error handling. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (launch-token, buy-token, birdeye-trending-tokens, birdeye-top-traders), which is good. However, parameter descriptions are minimal (1-2 words), and critical parameters like 'slippage' lack range constraints. No output schemas documented. Error handling is absent, no recovery guidance or actionable error messages visible in code. The token launcher and buyer tools perform irreversible financial operations (WRITE risk) but lack confirmation patterns or dry-run support. Descriptions are adequate (50-100 chars) but could be more specific about prerequisites and return values.

• Add output schema documentation for all tools. Example for launch-token: 'Returns {token_address: string, transaction_hash: string, metadata_uri: string}'. This enables LLMs to chain calls.
• Add numeric constraints to parameters: 'slippage' (0-100, default 5), 'amount_sol' (min 0.1, max 1000). Use parameter descriptions to state ranges explicitly.
• Implement confirmation pattern for destructive tools. Add optional 'dry_run: boolean' parameter to launch-token and buy-token, or require explicit 'confirm: true' parameter.
• Enhance parameter descriptions. Replace 'Token name' with 'Token name (2-50 characters, alphanumeric + spaces)'. Replace 'Amount of SOL to spend' with 'Amount of SOL to spend (0.1 - 1000 SOL; will be converted to WSOL for swap)'.
• Add error handling with recovery guidance. Example: 'Insufficient balance. Current balance: X SOL. Required: Y SOL. Fund your wallet and retry.' Categorize errors as retryable (network, rate limit) vs user-fixable (insufficient funds, invalid token).