Evidence-first protocol gates, verification, traces, Hyperplan, and durable Horizon orchestration for Claude Code
Critical gaps across all dimensions. Tool descriptions are present but minimal (10-50 chars, well below the 194-char baseline). Input schemas exist but lack parameter descriptions entirely, every parameter is undescribed, violating the 100% A+ baseline. No output schemas documented. Tool names lack clear action verbs (parallax_checkin, horizon_record_audit are vague). No error handling guidance, no pagination support, no idempotency markers. The server appears to be a specialized orchestration/verification tool for Claude Code, but the definitions do not meet production quality standards for agent reasoning.
Get active child agent in Horizon orchestration
Read Horizon orchestration plan
Read Horizon orchestration state
Record audit event in Horizon orchestration
Check in evidence and protocol state during verification
Export trace data for analysis
View trace data for a session
Verify project state and run verification commands
All 8 tools lack parameter descriptions. Input schemas define types (string, object) but provide no guidance on what each parameter controls, expected format, or constraints. LLMs cannot infer meaning from bare type names.
No output schemas documented for any tool. LLMs cannot plan downstream calls or extract required fields without knowing what each tool returns.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 37 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
Tool names lack clear action verbs. 'parallax_checkin' and 'horizon_record_audit' are vague, does checkin verify, store, or validate? Does record_audit log, persist, or report? Baseline: 90% of A+ tools start with get_, create_, update_, delete_, search_, list_, send_.
Tool descriptions are too brief (10-50 chars vs. 194-char baseline). 'Check in evidence and protocol state during verification' and 'Record audit event in Horizon orchestration' lack context on WHEN to use, WHAT happens, and WHAT is returned.
No error handling guidance. Tools do not document what errors can occur, whether they are retryable, or what the LLM should do next. Baseline: A+ tools include recovery hints like 'If session not found, call parallax_verify() first.'