Server has 7 tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps limit production readiness. All tools have input schemas with type definitions and descriptions present, meeting minimum requirements. However, descriptions are minimal (10-50 chars), parameter descriptions lack detail about constraints/formats, and output schemas are completely undocumented. No error handling guidance, no parameter validation rules, and no indication of idempotency or side effects. Tools mix filename-based and ID-based lookups inconsistently (search/upload use names; update_file_content/delete_file use IDs), creating cognitive load. No pagination support despite resource listing. Security concern: no mention of permission checks or audit logging for destructive operations.

• Document output schema for every tool. Example for search: 'Returns {files: [{id: string, name: string, mimeType: string}], nextCursor?: string}'. Include field types and meanings.
• Standardize parameter naming: offer both human-friendly names (filename) AND system IDs (fileId) in the same tool, with clear guidance on which to use. Or provide a separate 'resolve_filename_to_id' helper tool.
• Expand descriptions to 50-150 chars explaining WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it, and what it returns. Example: 'Search Google Drive for files matching a query. Returns file IDs, names, and MIME types. Use before read_file_content if you only know the filename.'
• Add parameter constraints in descriptions. Example for 'query': 'Search query string (1-500 chars). Supports Google Drive search syntax (name:, type:, owner:, etc.).'
• Add error handling guidance to descriptions. Example for delete_file: 'Deletes a file permanently. Returns error if file not found or user lacks permission. No undo, consider implementing a trash/restore pattern.'