Three tools with clear verb-noun naming (analyze_repo, get_style_rules, refresh_style_profile) and reasonable descriptions (120-180 chars). All parameters have type definitions and descriptions. However, output schemas are not documented, the tools return plain strings with no structured field definitions. Error handling is minimal (no recovery guidance for 'no files found' case). Tool annotations present but incomplete (missing destructiveHint details). Parameters lack constraints (e.g., path validation, enum values). No pagination or result limits documented despite potential for large analysis outputs.

• Document output schema as a structured object: {rules: string, total_files_analyzed: number, supported_languages: string[], analysis_timestamp: string}. This enables LLMs to extract and chain data.
• Add error recovery guidance: 'No supported source files found under {path}. Ensure the directory contains Python (.py), JavaScript/TypeScript (.js/.ts/.jsx/.tsx), React/Next.js, CSS, or HTML files.'
• Correct tool annotations: set destructiveHint=true for analyze_repo (when save=true) and refresh_style_profile (both write to disk).
• Add path parameter constraints: 'Must be a valid directory path (absolute or relative). If relative, resolved from current working directory. Must be readable.'
• Add result size guidance: 'Output may be large for codebases with many files. Consider calling with smaller subdirectories if output exceeds context limits.'