Server has 9 tools with consistent naming (verb_noun pattern: list_*, get_*) and descriptions present for all. However, descriptions are brief (avg ~80 chars, below the 194-char baseline for A+ tools) and lack context on WHEN to use each tool or dependencies between them. Input schemas are visible and typed with enums for constrained fields, but output schemas are not documented, LLMs cannot predict response structure. No error handling guidance, no pagination limits stated, and no indication of which tools are idempotent or safe to retry. Parameter descriptions are adequate but sparse. Overall: functional but below production baseline.
Retrieves detailed information for a specific asset by its symbol.
Retrieves OHLC data for a specific asset, fiat currency, and timeframe.
Lists all user's asset wallets grouped by asset type from the Bitpanda API.
Lists all user's commodity transactions from the Bitpanda API. Newest commodity transactions come first. Response is cursor paginated.
Lists all user's crypto transactions from the Bitpanda API. Newest crypto transactions come first. Response is cursor paginated.
Lists all user's crypto wallets from the Bitpanda API.
Output schemas not documented. LLMs cannot predict response structure or plan downstream tool calls. No indication of which fields are returned or their types.
Pagination tools (list_*) lack documented result limits. No indication of max page_size, default limit, or whether results are capped. Risk of context window exhaustion.
Descriptions are generic and lack context. No explanation of WHEN to use each tool, dependencies between tools, or what data each returns. Avg description ~80 chars vs 194-char baseline.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | D | 54 | 2025-06-18+ | v2 |
Lists all user's fiat transactions from the Bitpanda API. Newest fiat transactions come first. Response is cursor paginated.
Lists all user's fiat wallets from the Bitpanda API.
Lists all user's trades from the Bitpanda API. Newest trades come first. Response is cursor paginated.
No error handling guidance. Tool responses do not indicate what to do on failure (retry, ask user, abort). No recovery paths documented.
No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, idempotentHint). LLMs cannot determine which tools are safe to retry or have side effects.