11 tools with complete JSON schemas and descriptions, but significant quality gaps. All tools have descriptions (10-100 chars, mostly 50-80 chars), and all expose input schemas with type definitions. However, naming lacks action verbs (e.g., 'aliases', 'bases', 'bookmarks' are nouns, not verb_noun patterns like 'list_aliases'). Parameter descriptions are minimal (5-30 chars) and lack actionable constraints. No output schemas documented. Error handling and recovery guidance absent. Tool composition is reasonable (single responsibility), but descriptions don't explain WHEN to use each tool or what it returns. Schemas are present but sparse, many parameters lack min/max bounds, format hints, or dependency documentation.

• Rename tools to verb_noun pattern: 'list_aliases', 'list_bases', 'list_bookmarks', 'list_commands', 'create_bookmark', 'execute_command'. This enables LLMs to infer intent from the name alone.
• Expand parameter descriptions to 50-100 chars with actionable constraints. E.g., 'File name (required, 1-255 chars, no leading/trailing spaces)' instead of 'File name'.
• Document output schemas for every tool. E.g., 'Returns: {aliases: [{name: string, file: string, path: string}], total: number}'. This enables LLMs to chain tools and extract required fields.
• Add error handling guidance to tool descriptions. E.g., 'append: If file not found, returns error 'file_not_found', try create() first. If permission denied, returns 'permission_denied', check vault access.'
• Add per-tool WHEN guidance. E.g., 'Use list_aliases to discover available aliases before referencing them in other tools. Use list_bases to see available database files before querying.'