Server defines 8 tools with clear names (verb_noun pattern: task_info, list_files, read_file, search_code, write_file, run_tests, get_diff, submit). All tools have descriptions (10-200 chars, within baseline 34-392 range). Input schemas present for all tools using Zod validation. However, schemas lack explicit type declarations in the visible schema objects (e.g., task_info has empty {}), and parameter descriptions are minimal. Output schemas are not documented. Error handling uses guard() wrapper but lacks recovery guidance or categorization. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint/destructiveHint) despite clear risk levels (READ_ONLY vs WRITE). Composition is sound, tools chain logically (list_files → read_file → write_file → run_tests → submit). Security: write_file refuses protected paths; no secrets exposed as parameters.

• Add explicit input schemas to task_info, run_tests, get_diff, submit. Even if they take no parameters, declare inputSchema: { type: 'object', properties: {}, required: [] } for clarity.
• Document output schemas for all tools. E.g., list_files returns { entries: [{ path: string, type: 'file'|'directory' }] }; read_file returns { content: string }. Include in tool registration or separate schema doc.
• Add tool annotations: readOnlyHint: true for list_files, read_file, search_code, run_tests, get_diff, task_info, submit; destructiveHint: true for write_file; idempotentHint: true for read tools.
• Enhance error messages with recovery guidance. E.g., 'File not found: path/to/file. Use list_files(".") to discover available files.' Categorize errors as retryable vs user-fixable.
• Expand parameter descriptions. E.g., search_code.max_results: 'Maximum results to return (1-500, default 100). Larger limits may timeout; use pagination for large result sets.' Add format hints for path parameters.