Critical failures across naming, descriptions, and schemas. 39 tools with minimal documentation. Most tool names lack action verbs (e.g., 'resources', 'vulnerability_scan', 'web_enumeration' are vague). Descriptions are present but generic (avg ~60 chars, well below 194-char baseline). Parameter descriptions exist but lack constraints, ranges, or format guidance. No output schemas documented. No error handling guidance. No idempotency markers despite destructive operations. Security tools expose dangerous capabilities (reverse_shell, hydra_attack, run_pentest, payload_generate) with minimal safeguards.

• Add explicit output schemas to all 39 tools. Document field names, types, and descriptions. E.g., vulnerability_scan should return {vulnerabilities: [{id, severity, description, remediation}], scan_duration_seconds, target}.
• Implement confirmation/dry-run pattern for destructive tools (reverse_shell, hydra_attack, payload_generate, run_pentest, session_delete, run). Add a 'confirm' parameter or require explicit approval before execution.
• Add enum constraints to all enumerated parameters. E.g., scan_type: enum=['comprehensive', 'quick']; severity: enum=['low', 'medium', 'high', 'critical']; operation: enum=['encode', 'decode'].
• Expand parameter descriptions with format, range, and validation rules. E.g., 'threads (integer, 1-256): Number of concurrent threads to use. Default 10.' instead of 'Number of threads to use'.
• Rename tools to follow verb_noun convention. E.g., 'resources' → 'list_resources', 'vulnerability_scan' → 'scan_vulnerabilities', 'web_enumeration' → 'enumerate_web_targets', 'network_discovery' → 'discover_network_hosts'.