Two tools with clear, actionable descriptions and well-formed schemas. However, both tools are READ_ONLY discovery/retrieval operations with minimal parameter validation. Naming is verb-forward (find_, load_) and follows conventions. Schemas include required fields and type declarations. Critical gaps: no error handling guidance (what if skill not found?), no pagination for find_skill results, no output schema documentation, and parameter descriptions lack format/constraint details. The tools are simple and focused, but lack production-grade robustness.

• Document the output schema for find_skill: return an array of {name, description, tags, author?, tokens} objects, plus a total_count field.
• Document the output schema for load_skill: return {name, description, body, references[], tokens, source?} so LLMs know what fields are available.
• Add min/max constraints to find_skill limit parameter: 'limit (1 - 100, default 10)' in the schema and description.
• Add error handling to load_skill: 'If skill not found, returns error with list of available skills matching the query. Try find_skill() first if unsure of the exact name.'
• Enhance load_skill reference parameter: document as 'Optional filename from the skill's reference/ directory. Omit to load the main skill body. Valid filenames: [list from skill metadata]', or return available references in the error if an invalid one is requested.