Server has 6 tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps prevent production use. Tool names lack clear verb-noun structure (queue_studio_command vs send_studio_command). Descriptions exist but are generic (10-50 chars for most params). Input schemas present but incomplete, many parameters lack type constraints and validation guidance. No output schemas documented. Error handling is absent; tools do not guide recovery. Parameters like 'command' and 'command_batch' are underspecified (what structure? what fields?). No enum constraints, no format validation, no dependency documentation between tools. Composition is weak: queue_studio_command and queue_studio_command_batch are similar but not clearly differentiated. execute_luau_script and call_luau appear to do the same thing. Security: no evidence of permission gates, audit logging, or secret injection patterns.

• Define the command schema explicitly. Document required fields, types, and valid command names. E.g. 'command: {type: "object", properties: {action: {type: "string", enum: ["create", "update", "delete"]}, target: {type: "string"}, ...}}'
• Merge execute_luau_script and call_luau into a single tool with clear naming (e.g., execute_luau_script). Document the difference if both must exist, or remove the duplicate.
• Add output schemas to all tools. E.g., get_studio_logs returns {logs: [{timestamp: string, type: string, message: string}], total: number}. This enables LLM planning.
• Add error handling guidance: 'Returns error if script syntax is invalid (SyntaxError) or execution times out (TimeoutError). Retry with shorter timeout or simpler script.' Include error codes and recovery steps.
• Expand parameter descriptions to 50-100 chars with format/constraint details. E.g., 'execution_timeout_secs: Timeout in seconds (1-300, default 30). Script aborts if exceeded; returns TimeoutError.'

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry