A local, offline directory of GTM tools scored on agent callability and access cost. Eleven read-only tools over a directory of GTM tools, answering which tools claim a job and by which interface (MCP, CLI), with zero outbound requests.
Strong foundation with 11 well-named, read-only tools serving a specialized GTM directory. All tools have descriptions (avg 65 chars, within baseline 34-392 range) and clear verb-noun naming (find_, get_, list_, plan_). Input schemas are present and typed. However, parameter descriptions are sparse, most params lack detail on format, constraints, or dependencies. Output schemas are not documented in the visible code. Error handling guidance is absent. The server is well-composed (each tool has one responsibility) and idempotent (all read-only), but lacks the LLM-optimization depth expected of A-grade tools.
The access axis on its own
Which tools claim a job, and by which interface (MCP, CLI)
Structured facts from vendor API docs, when crawled
Both routes into one tool: the MCP endpoint and the CLI
What one MCP server actually exposes
One entry, every field, every source URL
The 15 categories with counts and gates
Output schemas not documented. Tools return structured data (entries, counts, metadata) but the response format is not visible in tool definitions. LLMs cannot plan downstream calls or extract fields without documented return types.
Parameter descriptions lack constraint details. 'query' in find_tools has no guidance on format, length, or tokenization. 'limit' in whats_building has no min/max bounds. LLMs cannot validate inputs without explicit constraints.
No error handling guidance. Tools are read-only and unlikely to fail, but if a tool ID is invalid or a search returns no results, the response should guide the LLM on recovery (e.g., 'Try list_categories to discover valid IDs').
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | D | 56 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
The closed capability vocabulary
A step-by-step shortlist for a multi-step GTM job
What vendors ship in public on GitHub, dated
The market statistics
Tool names 'whats_mcpd' and 'whats_building' use colloquial phrasing instead of verb_noun convention. 'whats_mcpd' should be 'get_market_statistics' or 'describe_market'; 'whats_building' should be 'list_github_releases' or 'get_vendor_releases'. Colloquial names reduce LLM clarity.
Pagination not visible for list-returning tools. find_tools and whats_building accept 'limit' but no offset/cursor or total_count. Large result sets could exceed context windows without documented pagination strategy.