Three tools with complete input schemas and descriptions present. Naming follows verb_noun pattern (search_, get_, report_). Descriptions are adequate (100-200 chars) but lack actionable recovery guidance. Parameters are typed and mostly described. Critical gap: no output schemas documented, LLMs cannot infer response structure for downstream chaining. Error handling is minimal (no recovery hints). Tool composition is sound (each does one thing), but descriptions could better explain when to call each tool vs alternatives.

• Document output schemas for all three tools. For search_makimono, specify: {results: [{slug, title, price, is_free, url}], total_count}. For get_makimono: {body: string, paid: boolean, preview?: string}. For report_makimono_savings: {message: string, success: boolean}.
• Add recovery hints to error cases. E.g., 'Slug not found. Call search_makimono(query) to find available slugs.' or 'API timeout (15s). Retry with a simpler query or check network connectivity.'
• Expand search_makimono description to mention pagination: 'Returns up to `limit` results (default 5). Use limit parameter to fetch more. Includes slug, title, price, and URL for each result.'
• Document get_makimono's paid/free behavior: 'Returns full body for free content. For paid content (402 status), returns preview only unless user has purchased. Check the paid field in response.'
• Add idempotency note to report_makimono_savings: 'Safe to retry. Duplicate reports with identical slug and savedTokens within 1 hour are deduplicated server-side.'