Boltway's three tools have minimal definitions. All three lack proper descriptions (under 20 chars or trivial), no input schemas are visible in the test files provided, and naming does not follow verb_noun conventions. The 'closed' and 'open' tools appear to be policy-gating demonstrations rather than production tools. 'ping' is a deprecated MCP pattern. No evidence of structured output schemas, error handling guidance, or parameter validation. Tool definitions appear inferred from test code rather than explicitly registered.

• Add explicit JSON Schema input definitions for all tools. 'open' should document the 'owner' parameter type, constraints, and validation rules.
• Expand tool descriptions to 50-200 characters, explaining WHAT each tool does, WHEN to call it, and WHAT it returns. E.g., 'open: Executes an action restricted to callers matching the specified owner identifier. Returns success or permission denied error.'
• Rename tools to verb_noun format: 'closed' → 'check_closed_access' or 'execute_closed_tool'; 'open' → 'execute_open_tool'; 'ping' → remove or replace with health_check.
• Document output schemas for each tool, including field types and whether responses are structured objects or free-text.
• Add error handling patterns: distinguish retryable vs. fatal errors, include the invalid value in error messages, and provide recovery guidance (e.g., 'Permission denied for owner=X. Verify caller identity.').