SecureMCP exhibits severe definition quality gaps across all dimensions. Tool names lack action verbs (e.g., 'scan', 'server', 'ScanAuth' mix conventions). Descriptions are present but generic and lack LLM-optimized guidance on WHEN to use each tool vs. alternatives. Input schemas are visible but incomplete: most parameters lack type constraints, enums, or format specifications. No output schemas documented. Error handling is absent, no recovery guidance, no categorization of retryable vs. fatal errors. The 10 tools show significant overlap (scan, Scan, ScanWithOptions all perform scanning) without clear differentiation. No evidence of idempotency, pagination, or composition patterns. Security concerns: no mention of credential handling, permission gates, or audit trails.

• Consolidate overlapping scan tools: rename 'scan' → 'scan_mcp_server', 'Scan' → 'scan_comprehensive', 'ScanWithOptions' → 'scan_with_filters'. Add descriptions explaining when each is appropriate.
• Standardize naming to lowercase verb_noun: 'server' → 'start_server', 'ScanAuth' → 'scan_authentication', 'ScanToken' → 'scan_oauth_token', 'ScanPrompt' → 'scan_prompt_injection'.
• Document output schemas for all tools. E.g., scan_mcp_server returns {vulnerabilities: [{type, severity, description, remediation}], summary: {total, critical_count, high_count}}.
• Add parameter constraints: 'endpoint' should validate URL format; 'format' enum is present but 'timeout' needs min/max bounds (e.g., 1-300 seconds).
• Implement error handling: return {error: string, retryable: boolean, suggestion: string} for all failure cases. E.g., 'Endpoint unreachable. Retryable: true. Suggestion: verify endpoint is running and accessible.'
• Add permission declarations to each tool (e.g., 'Requires: read:mcp_server, write:reports'). Document audit trail expectations.