This server has critical definition gaps. Both tools lack proper parameter descriptions, the 'location' and 'temperature' parameters have only type info, no guidance on format or constraints. Tool descriptions are minimal (18-27 chars, well below the 50-200 char LLM-optimized baseline). No output schemas are documented, so LLMs cannot predict what fields to expect. No error handling guidance. The naming is acceptable (verb_noun pattern: 'weather', 'convertFahrenheitToCelsius'), but the overall definition quality is far below production standards.

• Expand tool descriptions to 50-200 chars. Example: 'weather' → 'Get current weather conditions for a location. Returns temperature (°F), condition (sunny/cloudy/rainy), and humidity. Accepts city name, coordinates, or zip code.'
• Add parameter descriptions with format guidance. Example: 'location: City name (e.g., New York), zip code (e.g., 10001), or coordinates (lat,lon). Required.'
• Document output schemas explicitly. Define what fields each tool returns and their types. Example: weather returns {temperature: number, condition: string, humidity: number}.
• Add error handling guidance. Example: 'If location not found, try search_locations() first. If API timeout, retry after 5 seconds.'
• Verify MCP transport and protocol compliance. Ensure tools are registered via MCP server interface with proper capabilities negotiation.