Server has 8 tools with basic Zod schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps limit production readiness. All tools have descriptions (10-50 chars, mostly short), and input schemas are present with type definitions. However, descriptions lack actionable context for LLM selection, parameter descriptions are minimal, output schemas are undocumented, and error handling is generic. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint/destructiveHint), no pagination support for list operations, and no guidance on recovery paths. Naming is clear and verb-based (create_, edit_, list_, get_, delete_), which is a strength. The server follows basic patterns but misses critical production-grade details like field-level documentation, structured error responses, and output schema documentation.

• Document output schemas for all tools. E.g., create_post should return {post_id: string, title: string, status: string, url: string} with field descriptions. This enables LLMs to chain calls and extract data reliably.
• Add pagination to list_posts and list_categories: accept 'limit' (1-100, default 20) and 'offset' (default 0) parameters; return {items: [...], total: number, has_more: boolean}. Cap results at 50 items per call.
• Expand tool descriptions to 80-150 chars. Example: 'Create a new WordPress post as a draft. Returns post_id and edit URL. Use edit_post to publish or modify after creation.' Include WHEN to use and what to expect.
• Add tool annotations via MCP SDK: mark create_post/edit_post/create_category/edit_category with destructiveHint=false (they're drafts/edits), mark delete_category with destructiveHint=true, mark list_posts/get_post with readOnlyHint=true.
• Improve error handling: return structured errors like {error: 'post_not_found', message: 'Post ID 123 not found', suggestion: 'Try list_posts() to see available posts'} instead of raw text. Categorize as retryable (network timeout) vs user-fixable (invalid ID).