14 tools with basic verb-noun naming (search_*, get_*) and present descriptions, but significant gaps in parameter documentation and output schema clarity. All tools are READ_ONLY, reducing risk. However, 11 of 14 tools lack explicit parameter descriptions in visible code (e.g., summarize_article_for_query has 'title', 'query', 'max_length' params but no inline descriptions visible). Output schemas are not documented, LLMs cannot infer what fields to expect. Descriptions are present but generic (avg ~50 chars), below the 194-char baseline for A+ tools. No error handling guidance visible. Tool composition is reasonable (single responsibility), but parameter validation and chaining support are absent.

• Document output schemas for all 14 tools. Specify field names, types, and what each field contains. E.g., search_tweets returns {query: string, results: [{id: string, text: string, author: string, created_at: ISO8601}]}.
• Expand tool descriptions to 100-200 chars. Include WHEN to use (e.g., 'Use this to find recent tweets about a topic; use get_user_tweets to get a specific user's timeline'). Add prerequisites if any.
• Add inline parameter descriptions in function signatures or docstrings. E.g., 'max_length: int, maximum summary length in characters (default 250, range 50-1000)'.
• Add error handling guidance. Document what errors can occur (e.g., 'User not found', 'Rate limit exceeded') and suggest recovery (e.g., 'Try search_users() with a partial name').
• Clarify pagination behavior. State default limit, max limit, and whether results are paginated or capped. E.g., 'Returns up to 10 results by default; pass limit=50 for more (max 100). Use offset for pagination.'

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry