Trinity has 7 tools with schemas and descriptions present, but quality is inconsistent. Naming follows verb_noun convention (skill_manage, learn, skills_list, skill_view, skill_file, session_search, web_fetch), which is good. However, descriptions are brief (avg ~80 chars) and lack actionable context for LLM selection. Parameter descriptions exist but are minimal. No output schemas documented. Error handling and recovery guidance absent. Tool composition shows some chaining potential (skill_file references skill_name from skill_view), but no pagination support visible for list operations. Security concerns: skill_manage and learn are WRITE operations but lack confirmation/dry-run patterns. No evidence of permission gates or audit logging in source.

• Document output schema for each tool. E.g., skills_list should return {skills: [{name, category, token_count}], total_count, has_more}. This enables LLM to chain calls and extract IDs.
• Add enum constraints to action parameter in skill_manage: {enum: ['create', 'patch', 'delete']} with description 'The action to perform: create (new skill), patch (update existing), or delete (remove).'
• Implement dry-run mode for skill_manage and learn. Add optional 'dry_run: boolean' parameter. Return what would happen without committing. Prevents accidental deletions.
• Add min/max bounds to numeric parameters: limit_tokens (1-100000), limit in session_search (1-100). Include in descriptions: 'Maximum number of results to return (1-100, default 20).'
• Add recovery guidance to error responses. E.g., if skill not found: 'Skill "xyz" not found. Call skills_list to see available skills.' This guides LLM's next step.