Server has 16 tools with mostly complete schemas and descriptions. Naming follows verb_noun convention (change_context, git_status, write_file). Descriptions are present but vary in quality, some are concise (git_status, workspace_info) while others lack actionable detail (git_compare, apply_patch, execute_command). Input schemas are visible and properly typed via Zod. However, several tools have incomplete parameter documentation, and error handling lacks recovery guidance. Tool composition is sound (single responsibility per tool), but some descriptions are too brief (<50 chars) to guide LLM selection effectively.

• Expand git_compare, apply_patch, and git_push descriptions to 100-200 chars explaining what they do, when to use them, and what they return. Document all input parameters with types and constraints.
• Add a 'dry_run' boolean parameter (default: false) to write_file, apply_patch, git_commit, and git_push. Return a preview of changes before committing, enabling agents to verify intent.
• Document execute_command with a list of allowed command IDs, their effects, and required permissions. Add a 'confirm' parameter requiring explicit approval for irreversible commands.
• Enhance error messages with actionable recovery hints. E.g., 'Invalid patch format. Expected unified diff. Call git_diff() to generate a valid patch.' instead of 'INVALID_INPUT'.
• Add output schemas to all tools. Currently, tool-catalog.ts accepts optional outputSchema but most tools do not declare it. Document what fields agents should expect (e.g., git_status returns {staged: [], unstaged: [], untracked: []}).