Loading ToolBench
MCP server for parsing and validating Hyperfoil benchmark definitions
Single tool 'parseBenchmark' has minimal definition quality. Tool name lacks action verb clarity (parse is weak; validate_benchmark or analyze_benchmark would be stronger). Description is present but generic (28 chars, below 34-char p10 baseline). Input schema exists with one parameter 'filename' (string type, basic description), but lacks output schema documentation entirely. No parameter constraints, enums, or format specifications. No error handling guidance. Tool does not follow verb_noun pattern effectively and provides no context on when to use it vs alternatives.
Parse and validate Hyperfoil benchmark
Missing output schema documentation. Tool returns unspecified result; LLM cannot plan downstream actions or extract structured data.
Tool name 'parseBenchmark' lacks clear action verb. 'parse' is ambiguous, does it validate, analyze, extract, or transform? Rename to 'validate_benchmark' or 'analyze_benchmark' for clarity.
Description is 28 characters ('Parse and validate Hyperfoil benchmark'), below p10 baseline of 34 chars. Lacks context on WHEN to use, WHAT it returns, and prerequisites. Should explain: validates benchmark syntax, returns errors or success, requires file path.
Parameter 'filename' description is minimal ('Full pathname of the benchmark file'). No format constraints, path validation rules, or examples of valid paths. LLM cannot infer whether absolute/relative paths are accepted or file extension requirements.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 30 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
No error handling guidance. Tool provides no recovery hints for common failures (file not found, invalid syntax, permission denied). LLM cannot self-correct or suggest next steps on failure.