Server has 5 tools with complete schemas and descriptions, but quality is mediocre. Tool names lack clear action verbs (evaluate_matlab_code vs execute_matlab_code). Descriptions are present (avg 140 chars) but lack context on when to use each tool or what distinguishes them. Parameters have types and descriptions, but no enums, ranges, or validation guidance. No output schemas documented. Error handling is minimal, errors return raw messages without recovery guidance. No security considerations for code execution (critical for a MATLAB execution server). Tool composition is reasonable but lacks idempotency guarantees for destructive operations.

• Document output schemas for all tools. E.g., evaluate_matlab_code should return {type: 'object', properties: {output: {type: 'string'}, execution_time_ms: {type: 'number'}, status: {type: 'string', enum: ['success', 'error']}}}.
• Add recovery guidance to error messages. Instead of 'Error: Command failed', return 'MATLAB execution timed out (30s limit). Try breaking code into smaller statements or increase timeout. Retry with simpler code.'
• Implement input validation and sanitization. Validate filePath is absolute, exists, and ends in .m. Return actionable errors: 'File not found: /path/to/file.m. Check path spelling or use absolute path.'
• Rename tools for clarity: evaluate_matlab_code → execute_matlab_code, detect_matlab_toolboxes → list_matlab_toolboxes. Add descriptions explaining when to use each (e.g., 'Use execute_matlab_code for inline statements; use run_matlab_file for reusable scripts').
• Add parameter constraints in descriptions. E.g., 'filePath (string, required): Absolute path to .m file. Must exist and be readable. Example: /home/user/scripts/myfunction.m'