Four tools with basic descriptions and partial schemas. All tools have verb-noun naming (search_site, get_page_content, get_sitemap, list_content) which is correct. Descriptions are present but brief (10-50 chars), below the 50-200 char baseline for LLM-optimized docs. Input schemas visible for 3 tools with type and description; get_sitemap has empty input object. No output schemas documented. No error handling guidance, no parameter constraints (enums, ranges), no idempotency markers. Tools are read-only (good security posture) but lack composition hints and chaining IDs. Definitions are minimal but functional, typical of a demo/example server rather than production-grade.

• Expand tool descriptions to 80-150 chars. Include WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it, and what it returns. E.g., 'search_site: Search page titles and content for a query string. Returns up to N matching URLs with snippets. Use before get_page_content to find relevant pages.'
• Document output schemas for all four tools. Specify field names, types, and whether results are paginated. E.g., search_site returns [{url: string, title: string, snippet: string}].
• Add constraints to numeric parameters. E.g., limit: 1-100 (default 20). Document in parameter description: 'Maximum number of results to return (1 - 100, default 20).'
• Add error handling guidance. E.g., 'If search returns no results, try a shorter query or different keywords. If get_page_content fails with 404, the page may have been removed, use get_sitemap to verify available URLs.'
• Consider adding tool annotations (readOnlyHint: true) to signal to agents that these tools are safe to call without confirmation, improving agent autonomy.